After a couple of weeks of navel-gazing, let’s get back to basics with this golden oldie! IP Draughts continues to think that software licensing is a cuckoo in the nest of IP licensing, not really part of the family but treated as a family member.
IP Draughts and his colleagues have some standard training materials that they use for teaching the principles of contract drafting. These materials include a slide that consists of a badly-drafted licence clause, on which they invite comments from the audience. For example, IP Draughts will be using a version of the following slide when he presents some sessions at the forthcoming PraxisUnico Advanced Licensing course, to be held at the University of Loughborough in a couple of weeks’ time.
Points for discussion in the above slide include:
- “grants and conveys” – why?
- “sole and exclusive” – why?
- licence under which IP? Does this need to be stated?
- list of permitted acts – appropriate?
- have made + have supplied = sublicensing by the back door?
- use of names Licensor and Licensee
- other points that may need to be included somewhere in agreement, eg whether sub-licensing is allowed
Imagine our surprise…
View original post 124 more words